Saturday, June 24, 2006

More On Those Shoulder Launched Cruise Missiles

Earlier, both Pat and I, posted on the rather bizarre segment where Loose Change talks about a cruise missile attack on the Pentagon (when they are not talking about an A3 Skywarrior attack) while at the same time showing a test firing of a shoulder launched anti-tank weapon.








The Loosers here indignantly complained that we were just nitpicking, and they never actually said a shoulder launched missile was used, but rather that was just the video they happened to have for this segment.

Well, the Loose Change boys, who thankfully show no end to their stupidity, thus providing us plenty of material to write about, have in fact provided us proof that they had actually considered the possibility of a shoulder launched missile being used in the attack on the Pentagon, while being interviewed on the Fred McChesney Show on Air America (H/T Loose Change Creators Speak):

Tim in Tempe: The presumption is that possibly a missile hit the Pentagon. It would have had to come from either a ship or a plane, correct?

Rowe: Or ground. Actually, it could have been a Javelin round, which is a two-man team can carry a Javelin round. It costs upwards to around $750,000 for the equipment for one round to actually have the piece that locks whatever you are shooting from. I mean, you could shoot it…

Caller: And it could cause the damage that was shown…

Rowe: I mean, if the missile inside and it can be modified .Yes, it could do that, but it would have to be significantly modified. But I mean, I would lean closer to a missile being shot by an airplane.

Yeah, OK. Obviously Specialist Rowe didn't learn anything when he was assaulting with the first wave into Afghanistan. A Javelin, which looks even less like a Boeing 767 than a cruise missile does, has a shaped charge warhead of all of 8.5KG, and would not punch a 90 foot wide hole in the side of the Pentagon, and continue through 3 rings of the Pentagon while dispersing airplane parts, much less cause a huge fireball billowing into the air.









Once again, you must be careful not to underestimate the stupidity of the Loose Change creators.

10 Comments:

At 24 June, 2006 22:07, Blogger James B. said...

LOL That is what he said as best as I could make out, I had to listen to it 3 times to try and get it right. I finally gave up since it was giving me a headache. I suppose I should put a comma in there to try and make some sense of it.

It is at the 13:30 mark of the second hour if you want to listen to it.

 
At 24 June, 2006 22:32, Blogger shawn said...

Yes, it could do that, but it would have to be significantly modified. But I mean, I would lean closer to a missile being shot by an airplane.

Wow, that makes sense. Instead of just suiciding a plane into a building like you already did twice, you have a plane fire a tiny Javelin round into the largest office building on the planet.

 
At 25 June, 2006 02:01, Blogger nes718 said...

This is like re-runs on TV. They just keep comin' back..

 
At 25 June, 2006 02:03, Blogger nes718 said...

BTW, this still does not take away from the fact that there were no 19 "hijackers." Why don't you do a thread on how there are no pictures of them boarding the planes instead of rehashing topics you already covered?

 
At 25 June, 2006 04:31, Blogger Alex said...

It would have done some damage. They do a good job on tanks, blow them apart quite spectacularily. But specialist rowe obviously didn't learn much during his time in the military. Are we sure this guy ever actually deployed anywhere?

 
At 25 June, 2006 07:18, Blogger Falco98 said...

Why don't you do a thread on how there are no pictures of them boarding the planes

no pictures doesn't make them "not real", no matter how many times you assert this. there are no pictures of Abe Lincoln being shot, so is THAT now untrue?

 
At 25 June, 2006 08:43, Blogger Alex said...

no pictures doesn't make them "not real", no matter how many times you assert this. there are no pictures of Abe Lincoln being shot, so is THAT now untrue?

Yeah, he was actualy strangled by a moassad agent working with the CIA. "That's fact well established."

 
At 25 June, 2006 09:39, Blogger James B. said...

There are pictures of some of them at the airport. What were they there for, the duty free shop?

 
At 25 June, 2006 11:51, Blogger shawn said...

Why don't you do a thread on how there are no pictures of them boarding the planes instead of rehashing topics you already covered?

You do realize this is a nonpoint, right? They don't take pictures of people boarding planes. I explained this to you.

 
At 26 June, 2006 10:08, Blogger James B. said...

In fact there is a town named George, Washington. This proves it, he was never an actual person, just a town!

 

Post a Comment

<< Home